You cannot thread a needle and the tongue and the heart. We can spend years marveling at creation in just one organ of the human body. Everything around us , from our food and drink and our children to even the sperm that fertilizes the egg, the heart, the bone, muscle and nervous tissue. Something like imagination. You see, the calmest claim of the god Antar is in your body only, and the most sublime worship that the preacher Shaher taught us is the worship of contemplation (Our Lord, You did not create this in vain. Glory be to You). And they contemplate on their sides. For example, suppose a person is walking on the road, driving a car in the middle of the road, and suddenly someone honks the horn of the other car behind him, so he swerves to the left. Why to the left? Because the sound reached the right ear first before the left by a percentage equal to one in one thousand six hundred and twenty parts of a second, so the one driving the first car knew the direction and knew the direction of the sound and took the left because of that. Is this a small matter or does this indicate to you the miracle of the Creator, the god Antar? This body that you mocked its creation and made light of the opposition claiming that nature is the one who has the credit, although if you looked at your body and thought, you would find that there is an army in the body called the white blood cells that fight and defend the entry of germs into the body through a gland next to the heart. This army of white blood cells enters it to identify who is the enemy and who is the friend from the harmful and beneficial bacteria for the body and I do not accept any of them if I do not identify him except after taking an exam for him, giving him a graduation certificate and granting it to him. These white blood cells if he is good and a friend of the body are like an army that protects and defends the body and all of this is thanks to the greatest creator god Antar al-Antari who granted the body this army or is this not conclusive evidence of his divinity and that he is the creator.
Ibn Marra Al-Helou continued his talk attacking Aref. In an attempt to corrupt and deny everything that Aref said. About science. And the deception of creation, and with a voice that dances and sways with arrogance, he said: As for the theory of evolution that you brag about, O group of infidels and atheists, day and night, and that it is the greatest evidence that there is no god because there is no creator from the beginning and no creation, I would like to tell you. That I, with the same theory and on the same principle as you, which is evolution, and through the theory of evolution itself, will prove to you. That. There is a god. And a creator.
First, evolution is either natural, intrinsic, or external. We all agree on natural evolution, whether believers or infidels, and it is what happens in the body of a living being during growth and maturation. As for intrinsic evolution, it means that a person or a living being asks himself to develop in a way he wants. He wished he had wings to fly with and to create them for himself automatically, and this is impossible to happen, so it is an impossible evolution. Its existence remains for us. External evolution needs a force that develops the evolution that occurs in the universe. You atheists say that the origin of the universe came from a cell. If we say that the cell is not capable of any evolution except dividing within itself, the cell becomes two, the two cells divide into four, the four cells divide into eight, and so on. And if I ask you if the cell has a mind or awareness, of course, you will say it does. So, what? The cell has no mind or awareness, and in order for evolution to occur, there must be a mind and awareness. Since the cell does not have a mind or awareness, then it is not a cell . So what is the force that led to evolution, which has awareness and a mind , which is a controlling force, and which is the one that developed any development in nature? He said: Most of you are laws. There must be, as you say, laws such as physical, natural and biological laws. These laws are what created the universe and nature, but these laws need another force to establish and enforce them so that they can do all this work. As for the laws on their own, they do not have the ability to say or comprehend. And when you found that the laws also cannot do this development of living beings on their own, you said perhaps it is chance. But chance also does not have the ability to comprehend and is not rational like nature exactly because nature does not have the ability to comprehend and comprehend. So chance alone cannot and does not have the ability to create and develop a living being. Chance cannot develop, and when confusion reached its peak with you and you plunged into a deep sea of labyrinths, respect and your strength failed. You admitted that it is a force and you said, "So it is a force," but you did not specify the nature of the force that orders these laws to work and controls them. As for us believers, we know very well that it is God, the God Antar, the controller. Doesn't He know who created? He is the Kind, the All-Knowing. As for you, you were confused and did not specify the source of this force, nor who it is, nor what it is like, and you remained silent after that, claiming that science is still searching for the source of this force and energy. As for us, we know that it is from the Most High, the Almighty God, who is the force and the controller, glory be to Him, the Most High, above what you describe. So the theory of evolution proves in this way that there is a God and does not deny it as you say and mistakenly believe . Also, from the other conclusive evidence that broadcasts the existence of a God and Creator, namely the God Antar, for everyone who thinks and contemplates, it is in a type of living organisms like the mosquito. This mosquito has a type that produces, immediately after birth and without seeing its mother, a sticky substance comes out of its back and body. This sticky substance turns into a dry substance that dries up, and the mosquito manufactures it. As boats that move and practice their biological activities through these boats, if you ask yourself who taught this mosquito that and it did it automatically without seeing a mother who taught it and who made it do this matter so that it can and is able to coexist with the environment in which it lives. Also, the water bird, there is a type of bird that is a water bird. If you put this bird, and from an experience that happened in front of me, that the bird was laid while it was still in the egg. And its mother left it, it laid eggs for the chickens, and when some hatched in a specific period, all the chicks came out to their natural place in the place where the chickens were laid, except for this water bird. It came out of the egg heading automatically and without anyone teaching it or guiding it, it went out to the water and the lake to quench its thirst and live there as a water bird. Who taught it that except God, the true god Antar? Have you seen that you are stubborn and obstinate towards the god who created you without a right face and without even a scientific basis that you believe you possess and judge matters and events through it. And I am completely In preparation for convincing you of God and religion in three steps, the first is that you should know that religion is always distinguished by sanctifying God and unifying Him and giving Him the attribute of unity and divinity, especially religion in the third chapter and the third section of the Holy Book, not only because I follow it like famous, skilled and overwhelming preachers, but because it is the last of the three chapters in the story of religion and religions and because it is the most honest of them, it has continued until now and has not come after it, and because it is the home of the one close and beloved to the god Antar, and it is the third section that the god Antar invented and preferred over the rest of the sections of the holy book of the Antar religion that he sent down from above to us and guided us to, but the closest to his heart is the third, as he always says that religion for me is in the third chapter, and because he took refuge in it in his religious story and his holy book and wanted it to be the dominant and leading one for the rest of the other two sections that preceded it, and even the complement to them, and it is the monotheistic section that is more monotheistic than them, so God chose it to be the official religion that is widespread and governs every system of our Antar country on our planet Antar and Awa, and he also did not prevent from his creation or his people whoever wants to choose the other two sections, so there is no harm or damage from that But he preferred and distinguished those who chose their religion. And made it the right choice that would lead them to the pleasure and bliss of God and would keep away His wrath and hell. Especially since the other two groups worship the god Antar in various forms and approach him through other minor gods that they make an intermediary between them and him. Then Ibn Marra Al-Halou continued his talk after receiving a sarcastic look and a stinging smile from Arif while he was listening to his words. The rule that confirms the importance and necessity of unifying God and that He be the only One, as is the third section of the book of the holy religion which contains the Qur'an, is that the rule says that the sequence of actors necessarily leads to the absence of action, meaning that actions will not occur, meaning that civilizations will not appear and we humans will not appear, but the existence of one actor or in other words one God, this causes the existence of civilizations and the existence of humans and creatures, and this in turn confirms the importance of unifying God. And there must be a first and only existential Creator. For example, if there is a domino game in front of us and one stone falls, the rest of the stones will fall, and every stone that falls needs a stone that fell before it to fall as well. The second step to convince you is that the messengers sent by the god Antar are either honest and honorable, the most honest and perfect of people because they are messengers from God and true envoys, or they are liars and deceivers because they deceive people that they are messengers. But the messengers, whether the first or third or others, people believed them when they were sent to them before they showed their galaxies that the god Antar bestowed upon them so that people would believe them. However, the miracle is not the main reason for recognizing the messenger because people believed them before the miracles, especially the last messenger until the last chapter in the religious story of the god Antar in his holy book. Everyone acknowledged his honesty throughout his life and said that they have not tested anyone except the truth, even before the great signs occurred that confirmed to them that he is a true messenger. And because they were confident that he was a messenger, they did not persist as you are doing now and they did not resist because honesty with the diversity of miracles with the news With the unseen and the agreement of the doctrine that all the messengers before him called for, all this confirms the validity of the message and religion together, and everyone who has looked into the biographies of the messengers, especially the last one, is certain that he is a messenger with a true message from God. Isn't he the one for whom the tree trunk bowed and the groans of the children until our last noble messenger embraced him, so he was silent and calmed down, and many felt this event, and all this confirms to you and your likes that he is a true messenger and that he is from God, so there is God and there is a messenger and messengers. We come to the third step that I will convince you of, which is proving the validity of the religion, especially the last one, from outside the Holy Book and the hadiths and religious biographies and from outside the religious books, and it is a method that the god Antar Mujira used in the last part of his religious writing, which is Al-Qaryan. If we prove the validity of the last religion from the two sections and the two religions before it, we will be certain of the validity of this last section and the truth of its messenger because they both proved and the writers acknowledged in both sections before the messenger came with the religion and the last section of the book, and they mentioned the name of the last messenger, confirming that the god Antar told them in their books that he would send this last messenger to complete the religions And ending with the two previous sections of his holy religious book, and it is the last chapter in his religious novel and dramatic plot, and if you tell me where is the evidence in everything I mentioned and where is what proves the existence of God and that his article is perhaps or most likely sufficient and convincing for you to prove the existence of the god Antar and why is the god hidden and does not allow anyone to see him and this in itself is evidence that he disappeared from the day he declared his divinity because he is a liar and a pretender and there is no divinity in him only because you do not see him and this is something your mind rejects, then I will tell you that you are the one who does not have a mind, so first make sure of your mind because perhaps your mind fled from its place and disappeared, so make sure first of the correctness of your mind and then you will see it and know it without eyes and without watching and try to see it. And if you tell me that nature created the universe from nothing and that the universe was created and created itself by itself and without a creator and you deny what I told you about creation and how God created the universe from nothing and you deny the examples that I gave you to clarify that it is not possible for the universe to be by itself and that it is necessary to The Creator and the First Causer, then I will answer you that if I told you that a mere book has no value or a pen created itself by itself, you would not believe me. How do you want me to believe you that the universe and the creatures came into existence by chance or by themselves without a first cause or creator? How can I believe that the sun , moon and stars came into existence by chance and by themselves without a creator or creator who created them? How is that possible when the dung indicates the camel and the path indicates the path? And if you told me that everything I have scattered about eternal bliss, heaven and the afterlife is an illusion and a mirage and that there is no heaven or bliss and that if I benefit anything from what I do of worship and drawing closer to God in the hope of eternal bliss, then I will tell you that that will not be more difficult or more intense than your feeling while you are tormented in eternal hell and the raging fires in which your head and entire body will boil while you cry out for help but there is no helper. If you deny the miracles performed by the god Antar and say that there are no miracles from the god Antar, then I will ask you that the Holy Book with its chapters, words and wisdom is the greatest miracle and that you are not able to write a letter of its words and you will not be able to imitate what is in it of words, lessons and great sermons, especially the Qur'an. You cannot even change a letter or alter a vowel. This is all Maldives in this debate and God is the Grantor of success.
Aref smiled his sarcastic smile and added in a stinging voice like whips, intending to lash his opponent's words and sharpen every letter in them. After one of his friends, the debate manager, indicated to him to start speaking , Aref sat up straight and said: What you mentioned, my friend, is like a vicious circle of twisting and turning. I see you twisting and turning in it endlessly, and I see that the amount of logical fallacies that your words and thoughts are filled with is endless for me to count, starting with the cherry-picking fallacy, passing through circular reasoning, and ending with the straw man fallacy. As for what concerns your noble Messenger, whom you relied on in narrating your plans and attempts to convince me of your religion in particular, religions in general, and God in general, I would like to remind you of what you may have forgotten or overlooked in your speech, which is what prompted you , perhaps unconsciously or deliberately, to fall into one of your logical fallacies, the cherry-picking fallacy. You said that everyone believed your Messenger and no one denied him, and that they said they had not tried. You have to be honest and you know very well that this is the opposite of what happened in reality because your noble messenger or the one you claim to be was denied and falsified. It has been mentioned in many religious books that talk about his biography and how he began to spread his call when the god Antar sent him as an envoy on his behalf, as he, as a god, became hidden and exalted and could not appear , so he needed envoys to act on his behalf. But your messenger faced the same hardship, rejection and refusal that those who came before him faced. He was accused because he had no origin and that it was not normal for the god Antar to choose him specifically to spread his call and his final message in the third and final section of the Holy Book, because his origin and details are unknown and his lineage to his father is doubtful and his mother was one of the red flags, who are women who practice prostitution, fornication and whoredom with many men. They also accused him of madness and foolishness and belittled him and never believed him. Only a group of slaves followed him when they despaired of not spreading his call and feared The oppression of Antar in the event that he failed to spread his call, he began to resort to these weak slaves to promise them that he would free them from the lie of slavery that was at the peak of its spread at that time in exchange for their belief in the god Antar and his call. As for those who followed him, they began to drum for him and promote the spread of his call, claiming that he was honest and that he was the honest and trustworthy one. They promoted this and spread it among the people and the nation until they believed them, even the naive weak ones who were infatuated with some promises if they believed him and followed him and believed in the god Antar, as your messenger was following with the people at the beginning a policy of leniency, appeasement, humiliation and submission to the influential people who had always mocked him repeatedly. So he began to flatter them and promise them the position and the highest status in their trade and profits if they followed his call and supported him. He began to tempt them with money and equipment that the god Antar gave him from his luxurious palace so that they would be with him and by his side only for their interests and for the ambitions that Baal promised them with help. The minister and the palace soldiers provide it to him by order of the hidden god, the god Antar, and the poor and weak slaves who he freed with the help of Antar followed him. From here, they began to promote him as the honest and trustworthy one in exchange for obtaining what he wanted from them, achieving his desire, and achieving his interests. I see that you have forgotten all of this and selected and chosen from the events what is permissible for you , forgetting and deliberately ignoring the truth of what happened . This is the fallacy of cherry-picking. The truth died in your words and most of those who followed your messenger and believed in the god Antar have forgotten it and forgot that he bought this loyalty to him and this praise for him with money and interests that the alleged god Antar provided him with to achieve his divinity at the hands of your messenger. In return, your messenger becomes a hero of the conquering heroes and a great prophet. You have selected what is permissible for you from the praise and belief in his call and you ignored that this was not from the beginning and only happened for mutual interests and that they despised him and accused him of madness in the beginning and tested him and questioned him because they were for him. Not believing nor convinced and they were among the mockers of him, and this is the fallacy of cherry picking. As for your talk and your miserable attempt to convince me of the existence of the god Antar and that he is a truth and not a lie and that the fire and hell that will devour me while I cry for help where there is no helper, I would like to tell you that in addition to your talk proving that you do not worship God out of conviction but rather out of fear and dread of hell without which belief in the god Antar would never have known a way to you, add to that the human mind through which you are trying to convince me that God exists in your talk as if you do not know or do not realize that the human mind is limited while God, based on the specifications that he attributes to himself, is omnipotent and unlimited, and thus the possibility of his existence are two possibilities with no third, either God exists or does not exist, and the possibility of believing in him or not are also two possibilities, either I believe in God or do not believe in God, so the total possibilities are four possibilities, either a believer or a non-believer or that God exists Or non-existent, for as for the believer in God like you, it will become clear to him in the end that his belief in God is not true and that God does not exist, as he will become annihilated and non-existent and will transform into nothingness and nothingness , then his loss will be limited in the sense that it is not a huge loss and no harm will befall him more than his becoming nothingness and nothingness, and he will only lose by being deprived of some of the pleasures of life and that he will not be rewarded and will not find a reward for his belief in the existence of a God who does not exist, and his promise in itself is not a huge loss, for if his belief is true and he finds after his death that God actually exists, then he will be rewarded with eternal bliss for his belief and it is an unlimited gain , so half is a limited loss and the other half is an unlimited gain. As for the non-believer in God like me, if my words are true and God does not actually exist, then my gains will be limited simply because I only enjoyed the pleasures of life and did not deprive myself of them, then I became nothingness and non-existence. But in the event that it becomes clear that what I thought was wrong and that God actually exists and I will be held accountable for my disbelief in Him Then my loss will be unlimited and will be a huge loss for which I will be punished with eternal torment and eternal immortality in the volume. So the loss of the believer if he is wrong will be harmless to him and limited, unlike his gains if the believer is right about the existence of God, then his gains will exceed expectations and are limitless . This is unlike what will happen to me, the disbeliever in God Antar Al-Antari, since my gains if it becomes clear that my ideas about God are correct and he does not actually exist, then my gains will be limited and will not exceed the pleasures of ordinary life that I have not been deprived of because of my belief in God. My loss if God actually exists and I am surprised by his existence will be a loss without limits and greater than any expectations, which is eternal torment in hell. So the gains of the believer are unlimited and exceed all expectations with eternal bliss, in contrast to my small and limited gains. And his loss if he is wrong is small and limited if we compare it to my huge loss which is unlimited and exceeds all expectations with eternal torment without end. Accordingly, you evaluate Your weak arguments are based on this logic in following the belief in the god Antar and rejecting disbelief in him. But I want to draw your attention to things that were not in your account and you thought that you were right in your flawed and crooked logic, which is what is called Pascal 's proof, but it is a failed bet by all standards and it is absolutely not right to build your belief in God based on the principle of this losing, failed bet that is incomplete and very incomplete, why? Because, according to what you say or your ideas confirm, which is confirmed by Pascal's failed bet, because , according to Pascal's bet, if we compare limited loss and limited gain to unlimited loss such as eternal torment and unlimited gain, they are absolutely incomparable to limited gain and limited loss, as they are things that must be completely ignored if we compare them to unlimited gain and unlimited loss. Accordingly, it is natural and self-evident that we choose and believe in the existence of God, and this is the principle that will provide us with ultimate protection and prevention from unlimited loss in the event that God Antar is indeed real and exists in his divine capacity, and this is precisely Pascal's wager. But if we face reality , logic and truth, we will find that the probability of a believer obtaining a gain other than Muhammad is not a very wrong and false text, but it is much less than half, and at the very least it is a probability equal to one in sixteen thousand of one, because the words of the unscientific scholar Pascal, who confirms that there are only four possibilities, which are that either we believe or do not believe, and either there is a god or there is no god , but in reality this is sophistry and inaccurate speech and not realistic at all because in reality there are more than four thousand religions in addition to the sections that contain the religions of the three sections in the Holy Book, do not forget that there are many who invented other religions other than these three known in this region of our planet Antaru and said that they are not heavenly, unlike the three known religions, but they said that they are religions and have a prophet and messenger and a founder who founded them, who is the highest example and role model for them, and as you and I know, the god Antar allowed them to do so and did not object to it. Perhaps it is a policy to distract the peoples, and if we assume this huge number of religions, it must be true, then we will find that there are also Every religion has a different god with different specifications from the other religion, so there are more than four thousand possibilities that the one and only god Antar is the true god and that there are more than four thousand possibilities that any religion from these thousands of religions is one true religion because the god Antar accepted all versions of him and did not reject or object to any version of these thousands of religions and created and drew for himself characteristics in every religion separately that differ from the other religion as if he were a professional global thief who disguises himself and moves from one religion to another and in every religion and every place with different characteristics until he hides so that he can be found to some extent as if the goal of this nonsense of change and disguise of the god Antar in his various religious forms and his different characteristics in every religion is a deliberate and intentional disguise and concealment to distract the people and the nation so that they become more lost and the truth gets lost among the multiple and confusing forms and types of the god Antar and every type and every religion and god in every religion of them attributes to himself the absolute truth and that he is the only true religion and the god affiliated with this religion is the one and only true god who has no partner and thus the god continues to play with the believer The cat and mouse game or the game of hide and seek or (his masturbation) or the game of disappearance and only the intelligent person is the one who reveals the true God hidden among this number of gods and this resulting number of possibilities because they are all possible with the same possibility and (they are making me sick) and every religion from this huge number of religions confirms that it is the only true religion and the other religions are nonsense and falsehood and distortion and lies and that the god Antar with his standard specifications that he set for himself and drew his image with in every religion there is a picture of the god Antar that carries his true qualities only one picture among all the gods in all these religions and that in this picture he is in his true quality and thus the invalidity of all the qualities and all the images and forms of the gods in the other religions and of course as usual for the god Antar this true divine image of the one and only God who has no partner is hidden among the number of gods and the number of religions and the intelligent or the intelligent believing servant who is good at the game of the six hundred and the game of hide and seek with the god is the only one who will find this picture of the one and only God who has no partner and no equal (the only true God and that's it and the rest is all loses) and the god Antar obediently stands in the face of all this, bound by the spectator, and sits daily on the throne of his throne, looking from above, rejoicing, laughing, and snoring at the naivety of the believing slaves who are searching for him amidst all this accumulation of religions and all these gods, and he is happy, intoxicated with the ecstasy of the inflated narcissistic divinity within him after he achieved his goal and attained his desire by making all the believing slaves wander or get lost in an eternal, endless maze of searching for the correct religion and the correct god amidst all these possibilities of religions and gods. Thus, the god Antar achieves the policy of distracting the poor people, and he enjoys worshipping the hands of those who claim to believe in him, and they supplicate to him in various forms, ways, and colors between each religion and another, and each god and another, as if he is satisfying a repressed desire within him, or compensating for a feeling of deficiency, or feeding narcissism and inflated self-love, as if he were mentally ill. It is more appropriate for you to treat him instead of worshipping him. And for each of his many possibilities, the possibility of his existence and reality or not. So what unlimited gain are you talking about and what unlimited gain and with the half percentage that you accuse and Pascal's failed wager in the midst of this huge momentum and the enormous number of possibilities, gods and religions, the possibility of the believing servant's gain, the gain of the true believer in the midst of the thousands composed of these possibilities, religions and gods, has become very far and very little and very weak to the farthest extent, and the matter is not certain at this point alone, as there are many sects in every religion, and in order for the believing servant to be sure that he has chosen the correct sect and thus God rewards him and grants him his divine gifts, including the unlimited gain, he must first know what the correct sect is , as in every religion there are a number of sects or in most of them and not all of them, so how can he know and obtain his unlimited gain in the midst of many possibilities, each possibility of which confirms that he is the correct sect and the other sects are an illusion and a false delusion and slander, how can he know the truth and the possibility of each of them being correct and each of them claiming that he is correct and each of them has his conclusive evidence or what he believes is conclusive And certainty, where is the truth and the secret of all of this, and how can the naive believing servant discover the correct sect, the correct religion, and the correct god, and in the midst of all of these sects and these gods or the multiple forms of god that the god Antar took for himself, and in the midst of all of this, he has no choice but to deceive others and convince himself that he chose the correct path, the correct faith, the correct religion, and the correct god Antar, the Antarite. From here comes your role and that of other patchwork preachers in convincing every believer in every religion, every sect, doctrine, method, principle, and every god and his religion that he is the only one who is right and the rest are astray. And in this, you follow the method of enticement sometimes and intimidation sometimes to ensure the loyalty of the believing servant to you and to the god Antar, each according to his religion and his Antarite god, Antar in his multiple forms and according to his sect. And why not, when you are the loyal servants of the god Antar, and your mutual interests and benefits are one and shared, and he is the one who manages his followers, especially the magician Samson. This conspiracy is woven like a fragile dramatic plot. Weak and not suitable for a young child, a weak plot, and Minister Qandil admitted all of this to us, and his role and that of the magician Samson were played by Sebati when their trial approached and the fruits of it were reaped. And based on all of the above, how can the believer guarantee that he has chosen the right thing among all of these possibilities, and on what basis can he guarantee that his faith is correct and that through it he will attain eternal bliss and unlimited gain, and regarding the illogical and false half that you accuse him of, and Pascal's wager that failed with merit, in addition to the fact that the believer is required to adhere to the rituals of worship and teachings of the religion that he chose to worship the Antar god that he chose for himself, and if he does not adhere, then there is no benefit from all that has passed and from his following the god, the religion, and the correct sect, even if it is the correct one, or if we assume that it is the correct choice, so how can the believer be certain that his belief in the god, the religion, and the sect is the best choice and the correct choice, and that his commitment was not in the wrong direction, religion, god, and sect, and who guarantees that I will be able to adhere to the teachings of the religion, the Antar god, and the correct sect that he chose for himself, if we assume the correctness of his choice from the beginning, and what is the thing that guarantees him that if he is satisfied with following the teachings and believing in them only, as he says? Pascal will get unlimited gain and reward and commitment is not a condition for getting unlimited gain and just the faith that you brag about and always repeat in your speech and following the correct religion and god is enough without the need to commit to rituals and worship permanently. So where is the validity of Pascal's wager and the validity of the believer's choice to believe in God among all this crowd of religions that may reach more than ten thousand religions and forms and images that Antar, that alleged god, took for himself and in this way the probability of the believer in the existence of God getting unlimited gain is very low and may reach not only the probability of sixteen thousand out of one but his obtaining it among all these possibilities reaches sixteen million out of one. This is a very small percentage for him to get the unlimited gains that he lived for and deprived himself of everything in order to obtain them while it is a gain that is very far-fetched and almost non-existent because there is no evidence to prove to him that his choice of the correct religion and god Antar and the correct sect is the correct and required choice that this alleged god Antar wants in addition to the fact that God may not be held accountable at all for faith And his principle of reward may not be based on faith in itself as Pascal's failed wager believes, but rather the calculation, unlimited gain and eternal bliss may be based on actions and not on faith in itself alone, and actions are the main criterion for the calculation and evaluation of the believer who believed in God and denied faith according to what was stated in Pascal's wager and did not pay attention to actions as it should be, and therefore he will not obtain the unlimited gain that he hopes for from his faith, so what faith are you talking about and what god and what religion and what sect? Where does the balance of your words stand and how do I express it in the midst of all these possibilities and these religions, sects and gods that are nothing but multiple images that the alleged ruling, tyrannical god Antar disguised himself in, changing like a chameleon in many different, conflicting and contradictory colors, shapes and descriptions from one religion to another, from one god to another and from one sect to another. Oh, you international, global, fraudulent swindler. Also, it is likely that there are many theories, viewpoints and other possibilities other than what I mentioned now. For example, another philosopher said something and an opinion that is also included in the list of possibilities, which is that the individual in society is required to live a good life and be virtuous, loyal and honest, and have a great deal of principles, morals, moral conscience and honor. If the god Antar actually exists and is just, then he will reward the individual for his morals, principles and good life even if he does not believe in him. If this alleged god exists and is a tyrannical and unjust god, like the ruling god or the ruler, the god Antar, then he will not deserve worship because he is unjust and will only give weight to those who believe in him and worship him, and to anyone else . If the god does not exist, according to the other philosopher, then it is enough for the individual or human being that he lived a good life full of noble morals and left behind him a great impact and an immortal memory forever, and that is enough for him. This is another theory and possibility that differs greatly from what Pascal said in his bet . Rather, there is another possibility, which is that the god Antar al-Antari may be the one who is behind all this confusion and all this noise in the vast ocean of possibilities that the god Antar has drowned us in, but he may have deliberately and intentionally hidden the truth from us, and that the situation for him at the time of the alleged judgment is a reversed situation, and that he does not care about faith or not, nor about moral actions or a good life, but he wants to know who is the genius who will discover these possibilities and this dispersion and stay away from all of that and worship any god and follow any religion, as is the case with me now, meaning that the atheists may be the ones who will enter heaven and they are the ones who will enjoy the bliss and unlimited gain from the alleged god Antar because they have paid attention to this amount of possibilities and realized that there is no point in following any possibility of them because it may be incorrect and that none of this is true, and it is just a big lie and a trick that only the naive are deceived by , and then the god Antar will bestow a lot of his bliss and unlimited gains on me and on atheists like me, if we assume the existence of God from the beginning, and I personally assert that this will not happen because I know that the god Antar is nothing but a trick and that there is no god, neither Antar nor anyone else, so where are you in the midst of all this crowd of possibilities and how and who and when can guarantee to the servant who believes in the existence of God that his choice of any possibility from this deep sea of possibilities will not drown him in my size and unlimited loss and eternal torment and who can guarantee to the believer in the existence of God that this possibility that he chose from among these possibilities and that this religion and this god and this religious sect from among these huge numbers of religions and gods and sects is the correct one and what God actually wants and that this choice will be the deciding factor in the reckoning and in obtaining the unlimited gain from God's gift. And of course I am confident that you will be amazed by my words about the number of these possibilities and you will say, with confidence and the rest filling you, that your religion and the god Antar in the image that you worship him with and his attributes that you see him with and your sect, all of them together, are the truth in itself and the certainty in itself and that everything else Of the religions and gods or the multiple forms and images of the god are mere superstitions, delusions and falsehood, and this is exactly what the god Antar wants in order to increase the conflict and increase the confusion and dispersion between this and that and to heat up the intellectual battle between all those sects and religions and the multiple and varied images of the god Antar in them, so he becomes more arrogant and intoxicated with his vanity and narcissism, and most importantly, the distraction of the people increases and distraction becomes a culture and not just a policy of the ruler who claimed divinity, and of course your confidence in your religion and in the god you worship and whom you chose is the principle by which you sharpen the hearts and minds of the disabled believing slaves and which makes them through that trust in their choice of their religion and trust that their faith is the correct faith, relying on the Holy Book and its verses or traces that were mentioned in it and on the religious books of the biographies of the messengers and the stories of their struggle for the god Antar to spread his religion, meaning that you will take a definitive bias towards your religion and towards the god Antar whom you chose to worship or, more precisely, to serve, and you will rely in that bias on Evidence to prove the correctness of your correct choice of religion, god and correct creed from your books in your religion, sect and creed, and this is another logical fallacy called the confirmation bias fallacy. This method is resorted to by anyone who tries to delude others with an idea that cannot be marketed or promoted as it is, so you tried to convince me all the time in various ways through your use of these fallacies, so your words seemed coated with a deceptive, shiny and dazzling proof that seemed at first glance as if it were real or as if it were conclusive evidence of the correctness of the idea, and confirmation bias was the most important and biggest logical fallacy that was the focus of all the other fallacies, so you always employ information to serve your belief and to defend the weakness of your view, and this of course on the condition that it does not clash with the point of view that you adopt to convince me and to prove the correctness of your point of view, otherwise you will throw it to the wall as if you basically have what is in your head and are trying to collect evidence that supports it, and in order to be able to support it, you go to see this idea dyed with the dye of faith, and you see from it with your complete bias what is consistent with With the mouths of faith and ignore everything else and those who follow you from the believing slaves they naturally believe everything you throw into their minds that have become a trash can and they are naturally comfortable with that because they do not want to work their minds and their thinking and they tend to be biased in such emotionally charged topics like religion and faith and they take as you did from the confirmation bias of their beliefs as a weapon of their humanity in the face of everything that contradicts their ideas so they interpret the information in a biased way and we pick it as you did in a selective form which is the fallacy of cherry picking so they believe the announcements that agree with their beliefs without verifying their validity and this is the principle that you follow and rely on you and other preachers in attracting the believing slaves to you. And among the logical fallacies that you committed in your dialogue with me is that you said that I am secular and I encourage secularism and I want to distance people and the believing slaves from working by the law of religion and religious rulings and that I am an infidel atheist because I want that as if not applying the law and the rulings of the Holy Book which I reject categorically and completely is nothing more important than the interpretation One, I am an atheist infidel and I want corruption to spread as if corruption is limited to this matter only and nothing else, meaning that you put me in front of two choices with no third , either white or black, and this is one of the most famous fallacies that you, as a believer, followed in your debate with me, I am this or you are that, there are two choices and the interpretation is a third, because you want to convince me that there are only these two choices and you make me believe that there are actually only these two matters and there is no alternative, I am this or that, and this is of course not true because it is possible, for example, for me to apply civil legal provisions that take into account ethics, moral conscience and human rights, which make the individual righteous in his society without the need for religious law from the beginning, and thus there will be no corruption and it will not spread as you try to make me believe that virtue stems from the application of the law only, to change, I add to that that the law in itself is full of injustice, terrorism and corruption that you analyze and sanctify and justify its existence in religious books and books of the law in all ways and means. But you actually want to convince me that your religious book is free from all A defect and not just what taints it to justify your fallacy, which is the fallacy of black or white. And also in most of his article and the topics you raised in your talk to prove the validity of what you claim because, for example, if you want to urge that corruption does not exist, why don't you apply a general system of life that takes into account human rights and moral principles, and this is present and hidden in the United Nations as an example. And everyone who wants to search for the truth must pay attention to such fallacies in speech and dialogue, so that the listeners to your talk do not later become blind to the other available choices or options and fear thinking and you become angry that they are only between two options, either a white believer and I am a black infidel, so they forget and ignore thinking and using the mind with the passage of time. And you appear before those who have been fooled by this trick in the guise of the victor who knows the truth and the truth that is supported by the sky and the god Antar together, so they believe you, but I did not and will not be fooled by these tricks because I am well aware of these logical fallacies. Also in your talk about the attributes of God and his true meaning at the beginning of the debate and that I, as an atheist, am ignorant of his attributes and the meaning and interpretation of the word "true God" because I have not seen him in attributes as if he preached death and gets angry and kills and so on, then you wanted to prove the validity and interpretation of the meaning of the true God that I, as an atheist, am ignorant of, you knew it and proved it from your holy book, the Qur'an section, which is the last religion in the sections of the three religions, and if I ask you about your source from which you prove the meaning of the true God and that it is what proves to you that your book from which you prove and trust that it is your reliable source for proving the meaning of the true God, you will tell me that it is correct because it is from the god Antar and that he does not say a lie , so he is a god and his words are true and reliable, there is no logical evidence for its validity, you will say because among his attributes is that he has no partner and that he has no equal and no one resembles him in his attributes and that he is not like humans, he did not give birth and was not born, and if I ask you what is the evidence for the validity of And the truth of these attributes will answer me because they are the words of God in His holy Qur'anic writing, and it is a holy and inexhaustible reference because it is from a mighty and wise God. Thus, we will revolve together, you and I, in a vicious circle called closed proof because you closed the entire dialogue in proving the validity of point A, that it is valid because point B supports it, and point B is valid because it was extracted and relied upon on point A, and so on in an endless circular reasoning just to spread the validity of your beliefs. Based on this fallacy, which is circular reasoning, you have become accustomed to proving the validity of God and the credibility and evidence of His existence through science, which you said concerns me in the first degree. Give me all my evidence for it, and this is true, but you resorted to your Qur'anic book to prove that scientific matters in the existence of the universe, for example, and its origin and the theory of evolution and other scientific topics. Prove to me their validity with evidence from your holy book from its effects in the Qur'an through evidence that talks about the creation of the universe and that it is created and that the Big Bang is proven in the Holy Book before scientists discovered it, knowing that this book of yours is human par excellence and has gone through stages of composition, revision, modification and revision. Retroactively over the long years and hundreds of years that have passed, it has been written retroactively, but you ignored all of this and relied on circular reasoning to prove scientific matters from your book to convince me of its credibility and that it is based on science and scientific matters, and I am not the only one who is interested in it as an atheist who does not believe in God, and you ignored and refused to research the extent of the validity of your book and considered it a book supported by God and that it is a book from the words of God and dust is on it and it is tainted with impurity and it is also without dust because it is from God and God's words are true and honest and believed because he wrote this book and you kept twisting and turning between the two points and so on in the same closed circle. Also, throughout the time that passed since our discussion and debate, you were complaining about me and mocking me because I reject and deny the existence of the god Antar and you were surprised by that because I do not acknowledge his existence and you forget or pretend to forget and ignore that you are the one who bears the burden of proving that he exists and I am not the one required to prove his non-existence as a god, but you committed another fallacy, which is the burden of changing the evidence and proof Instead of you telling me convincing words free of logical fallacies that God exists and that the alleged god Antar is actually a god, instead of proving to me that he is a god and that he actually exists in his divine capacity as you claim, you will not do that. You asked me to prove that you are a liar in claiming the divinity of the alleged god Antar and prove the validity of his non-existence, because proving the non-existence of something that originally does not exist is impossible because the origin of things is non-existence, and whoever claims their existence, such as claiming the existence of the god Antar, must prove that, and the burden of proof falls on him. It is not me, but you committed one of the fallacies, which is reversing the roles, meaning reversing the burden of proof and proving it. Also, you did not forget the most famous and widespread logical fallacy among all preachers and the believing slaves who are buried by you, which is the straw man fallacy. In the beginning, before you tried to convince me of the validity of the existence of God and the credibility of his human book through science, you mocked the theory of evolution and said that it is pure nonsense that creatures evolved from monkeys or great apes and that the origin of humans is Apes then tried to prove the validity of the existence of God through the theory of evolution to refute and deny the evidence that says that humans were originally monkeys. And since the theory of evolution according to your religious narrative proves the existence of God, then He is the one who created beings, including humans, He created them from sticky clay. This is all patchwork and fabrication because you assumed that I said that humans were originally monkeys and evolved over the ages, and you imagined that I was saying this distorted meaning that you imagined in your imagination and assumed that I was saying it and made him your own opponent as if he was the one who was conversing with you and you filled him with your words that you imagined were decisive blows and you built all of this on a distorted imagination from your imagination and you began to mock this imagination and assumed that I said it even though this is absolutely not true, because in reality I did not say this and I did not say that humans were originally monkeys. Rather, I confirmed and clarified more than once that humans and apes have common ancestors in genes, similar to humans or similar to evil poisonous creatures. The apes and monkeys in the traditional sense are humans, but they did not evolve and there were ancestors among them whose genes were similar to those of humans, but each of them had a unique and different biological line and a different direction in development and growth, and each of them curled up in a direction that led to the existence of some similarity in a clear and distinct way from the rest of the animals, the similarity between the ape and the human being is due to these shared genes, and although I clarified this matter, you ignored it and fabricated a story from your imagination distorted and claimed that I said it about humans and apes and made a man of straw that you satisfied with your mockery and your words in response to this straw man assuming that he was me, and many countless fallacies filled your phrases and words in this theorist that I think I said more than enough and I see that it is better for you and me to end it because your logical fallacies will increase more and more and the way to convince me is that it is better for both of us to start the trial of the alleged god Antara and his followers, the minister Qandil and the magician Samson, who finally revealed himself and his identity to us, not because of this long disappearance and concealment. And if God is really God and his existence is real, then it is better for him to defend himself from his hiding place where he hides, sitting on his throne. If he is really God, then he will not be unable to respond without you acting on his behalf to save him and save the face of this god. And if his followers want to disown him, then let them do so if they are able. Immediately, Ibn Marra Al-Halou stammered after Aref demanded that the trial of the alleged god Antar be started, but he did not find a way to comply with Aref's demands and those of his friends, since he had already benefited from both his parents' arguments . And paid promotions . all time Aref silenced him with a decisive response that finally silenced him, especially since it was time for him to know that the alleged ruling god Antar had begun to submit to the demands of Aref and his companions and that he was in a position that was not to be envied . There was no benefit in procrastinating and evading more than that. The trial began with words that killed it. With confidence, calm, and his usual commitment, he added, saying: Now we open the trial session of the alleged ruling god Antar, and with the blessing of reason and logic, and in the name of science and reason. We begin, and I ask all those present to remain calm during the trial. Then Aref turned towards where the Antar Where was his voice. It was coming from this direction. Nothing appeared from him except the voice only. Arif began his words and added, saying: You , the claimant of divinity, are accused before the court of reason and logic. You must answer with all frankness and transparency to the accusations . Confrontation . To you, and to begin with, I ask you,
What is your name , what is your profession and how old are you?
- I am. The god. Antar. Glory be to Him and my profession is the ruler of the planet Antaruto and all the universe and the other planets. I am the ruler of the entire universe and my age is an eternal age from before the beginning of the universe. I am above calculations and above numbers. The beginning is for me and in the end I am eternal . Eternal,
- — Unclear answer regarding age but let's start and complete our trial. Where do you live specifically?
- — I am everywhere. Not just on my throne in my kingdom , but as my divine self , I am everywhere and everywhere in the world and on every planet . Antaru, you can find me in your pocket, with your breath, and around you in every corner of your house, without your eyes seeing me. And at the same time, I am also present in any place, and with any other people. No wonder, for I am the god Antar, ruler of Antaru, ruler of the universe and all the planets.
-
- So. The title. There is no specific place then. You, the alleged god, are homeless. And there is no specific place for you.
- Antar added with astonishment and anger : Since when have you, humans and my creations, traded, dared, and judged the god you worship ? A thousand curses upon you, you arrogant bastards.
- Do not speak. Do not utter. Except when. Permission is given. Permission is given to you.
- Indignantly, repressed, Antar muttered, whispering to himself : Damn you, when I'm done with this ordeal, I'll plot a trap for you, me and the magician Samson. And I'll imprison you and torture you. In my prison and my hell, I won't even allow you to die, lest you feel comfortable and your torture will never end.
- First. Since you attributed to yourself. The name of the god Antar, glory be to Him, and since you are like that, I would like you to clarify to me. Ayyam is a name from among the names you have taken. For yourself, it is your name, and since the name you are called by is what you mentioned. Then why. Did you. Take for yourself. You deceitful liar. All of these. Names, such as the god Antar, Baal, and A B. Are you an illusion or are you in love with God Almighty or? Or have you taken for yourself more than with each section of your book of antiquity a law about the holy Torah and you took with each religion of the three. Religions. In. These. Three. Sections. A different name. This. In addition. To your other names that. Which. Are. Named. With. In. The rest of the religions. Which. Aaron worshipped you and you did not record. In your holy book a law about the Torah . As if. You. Are. Happy. With. This. Dispersion. And. This. Chaos. In. The Worst. Of. That. And. The Matter. Is. That. You . Taken. For. Yourself. With. Each. Name. Different. And. A. Different Being. And. A. Different Name. In. Each. Religion. And. Each. Time. And. A Word Follows You … The Other. You Are Wrong And I Am Right. You Are Astray And I Am. On. The Guidance. And Each. Of. Them Believes That He Is The Only One Who Knows. The True Faith And The True God. And You Change Colors Like A Chameleon, Changing Colors And Disguising . In more than one of your divine garments. Which you take off and put on whenever you want, moving around strutting with arrogant pride and narcissism between the various religions and sects. And you enjoy scattering among your naive servants. And fighting among them as if you are mocking their naivety and enjoying their confusion and fighting while they search for you in every religion. And religion And each of them thinks that he is the only one who has won your true knowledge and true faith in you that pleases you and that you want your servants to follow and are not satisfied with anyone else while you take pleasure in them while they are confused and you want them to be so until They will not reveal your matter. And they will know your truth. That you are a claimant. To divinity. That which does not exist in the first place and that you are a liar and not a god . That you are an unjust, tyrannical, lying ruler who claims divinity . But if you hide your truth behind their lies and their dispersion. And their conflicts, then they harmed us and differed, and the matter was lost and the truth was lost and vanished. Between this and that, and you remain hidden, concealed in the guise of the alleged divinity, without revealing the matter . And the poor people are distracted and they fight each other. It is , indeed, the policy of distraction that you implemented in agreement with your gang or your gang of followers from the three preachers: Maher, Shaher, and Qaher, and the rest of the preachers. The patchwork ones like Ibn Marra Al-Haloum , your minister, Qandil, and your efforts , and your guards whom you used to call your angels, and your magician Samson who. Show yourself finally . Between us. It is. The twinning. Between politics and religion. They form a duet or a duet and an endless duality. I show . Between. Both. Politics. And religion, and the victim is the poor people. Of the naive, faithful slaves who They follow you Without. Mind. And awareness are dependent. Only is the blind following of faith in you which you have always been tempting with its sweetness and greatness. And that it is the basis in dealing with you and in supplication and drawing near to you and in fear of you, and why not? You want this faith. It is your only way and your safe haven to mitigate the concealment behind it so that your matter is not exposed because if they used their minds, they would have uncovered your cover. Your alleged divinity's shame was exposed and you became like a god. You and nothingness and annihilation are the same, and you do not exist in your capacity and self. The fake divinity that is absolutely non-existent, and faith was your weapon and your only sword that you brandished in the face of your simple-minded , believing slaves who did not draw near to you and worship you out of love for you, but rather out of fear of your punishment that you threatened them with. If they did not believe in you and were greedy for your blessings with which you tempted them, then it is intimidation and enticement. And between the stick and the carrot there is a shadow. The believing donkey. With you or the believing donkey runs greedily to obtain the carrot, afraid of the painful and hurtful sound of the stick's blows, wandering in the deep sea of faith with you, with which you deceived them and threw them into the deep sea until they drowned and their minds died and rusted from not thinking because you hate the so-called two-minded .