Does this mean that actions no longer need what follows to appear as an even purer response to the problem?
Those explorations, which seem to be implying their own conclusions, also make it harder to have an even purer cognition of the problem afterward.
What remains is the subsequent understanding that brings about what seems to be a more satisfactory and appropriate analysis of the problem.
Thus, there is no longer a need for what ultimately becomes the most pure and appropriate cognition of the problem.
Such understandings or analyses that are deemed acceptable and appear to be most satisfactory are also accepted by people.
What then will the remaining responses bring about, in terms of a seemingly more detailed explanation or clear analysis of the problem?
Will the ability to comprehend the problem in an even more detailed and appropriate way also eliminate the need for any other concerns?
