From the front, the thing indeed looks like a bomber, but from the side and rear, it seems somewhat wrong.
It's not surprising, mainly because the thickness of this bomber doesn't match my concept of a bomber.
According to usual perception, the thickness of a bomber generally is quite good if it's 1/10 of its wingspan.
But now, the ratio is completely disproportionate.
Let me put it this way, the height seen from the back, that is, its thickness, is about half of the entire wingspan.
How can we describe it?
In their understanding, how can this possibly fly?
This doesn't conform to aerodynamics.
For a moment, everyone's eyes were filled with puzzlement, looking at Davis, waiting for his explanation.
Because it wasn't yet the time for questions, they had to keep quiet, holding back their curiosity.
Fortunately, although there were plenty of photos, they were played in a few minutes.
When the photos finished playing, Davis froze the frame on the very first photo.
